Get ready for a deep dive into the battle of the biggest AAA first-person shooters this holiday season, where I share my thoughts on Call of Duty Warzone, Battlefield 2042, and the Halo Infinite Campaign. Spoiler alert: not all are created equal! While Halo Infinite impresses with its open-world feel and solid gameplay, Call of Duty seems to be losing its touch, offering a lackluster experience that fails to recapture the magic of Modern Warfare. Battlefield 2042, despite its controversies and performance issues, still manages to deliver some fun, albeit with significant room for improvement. Tune in to discover which game comes out on top, which one is just okay, and what needs to change in the industry for a better gaming experience.
Timestamp:
Takeaways:
- Call of Duty Warzone’s new map has disappointed many players, showing a decline in quality.
- Battlefield 2042, despite its controversies, still offers fun gameplay for some players.
- Halo Infinite’s development time resulted in a more polished experience compared to its competitors.
- The current trend of annual game releases may harm the quality of FPS titles.
- Developers like 343 Studios should be commended for delaying games to enhance quality.
- The FPS genre is experiencing a unique dichotomy where player expectations are not being met.
Links referenced in this episode:
Companies mentioned in this episode:
- Zenni.com
- Call of Duty
- Activision
- Battlefield
- EA
- Microsoft
- 343 Studios
- Halo Infinite
Discover more from Digital Cafe Media
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
